Dynamic contracting under adverse selection and renegotiation

نویسنده

  • Lucas Maestri
چکیده

We study an in…nitely repeated principal-agent model with adverse selection and renegotiation. The model is suitable for studying procurement, labor market relationships, and monopoly pricing, which is our main interpretation. A monopolist faces a consumer who has private information regarding his preferences for quality. The monopolist can o¤er long-term contracts, promising to deliver a certain quality in each future period. The terms of the contract must be honored unless both parties agree to renegotiate. The monopolist chooses to gradually screen consumers who have high taste. During the screening process, these consumers balance the desire to immediately start consuming the high-quality good against the wish to pool themselves with consumers who have low taste and purchasing the high-quality good at a lower cost later. The model predicts an expected wedge between the marginal bene…t for each kind of consumer and the marginal cost for the monopolist. As the parties renegotiate, this wedge gradually decreases and eventually disappears. We show that a version of the Coase conjecture holds for the monopoly model even in the case of a nondurable good. The possibility of renegotiation decreases the monopolist’s ability to extract rents from consumers. This e¤ect becomes more severe when the time periods shrink and, as a result, the allocation converges to an e¢ cient allocation. I am very indebted to Larry Samuelson for his encouragement, support and guidance. I am also very grateful to Dino Gerardi and Johannes Hörner for their valuable advice. I thank Dirk Bergemann, Mehmet Ekmekci, Eduardo Faingold, Daniel Gottlieb, Vitor Luz, Rick Mans…eld, Giuseppe Moscarini, Philip Reny, Eduardo Rodrigues, Priscila Souza, Joel Watson and all the seminar participants at Yale and at the Midwest Economic Theory Conference for comments and suggestions. Any remaining error is mine.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Some Notes on Dynamic Adverse Selection

This key tension in this set of topics centers around the role of commitment in longterm contracting. Previously, we assumed full commitment power on the part of the Principal in setting all aspects of a contract. In a dynamic setting, the ful…llment of the early stages of a contract provides information to the Principal about the agent’s type. Naturally, the Principal will be tempted to act on...

متن کامل

Optimality and renegotiation in dynamic contracting

We characterize the optimal renegotiation-proof contract in a dynamic principal–agent model in which the type of the agent may change stochastically over time. We show that, under general conditions, the optimal contract with commitment is renegotiation proof even when type realizations are serially correlated. When the renegotiation-proofness constraint is binding, it is always optimal to part...

متن کامل

Complexity and Renegotiation: A Foundation for Incomplete Contracts

The paper considers a hold-up model where only one of n future trading opportunities will prove to be efficient, and where ex post renegotiation of the ex ante contract cannot be prevented. As the environment becomes more complex (n→S ), the outcome under any message-contingent long-term contract converges to that of the ‘‘incomplete contracting’’ model where trade is contractible ex post, but ...

متن کامل

Dynamic Contracting under Imperfect Public Information and Asymmetric Beliefs∗

We develop a dynamic principal–agent model to show how imperfect public information and asymmetric beliefs, asymmetric risk attitudes, complementary actions by both parties, and inter-temporal adverse selection arising from the agent’s unobservable actions interact to affect optimal dynamic contracts. Our continuous-time formulation of the model, which features both “hidden actions” and “hidden...

متن کامل

Notes on Incomplete Contracts

Throughout the course, we have assumed that all contracts are complete. This is, of course, complete nonsense in reality but a useful starting point in theory. But why is it complete nonsense in reality? What are we missing? Many stories have been suggested. One possibility is that we can, indeed, think of all possible contingencies, but it is costly to write all of these down in a contracts (L...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • J. Economic Theory

دوره 171  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017